Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hakan Erdogmus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:32, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Hakan Erdogmus

Hakan Erdogmus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Creator of entry requesting deletion of biographical entry about him Erdogmush (talk) 03:44, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

• Delete Author of this AfD seems to be creator of that article. I assume his self identification is true. Wikipedia deletion policy allows deletion of articles about relatively unknown, non-public figures, where the subject has requested deletion. So my vote is delete, until someone proves higher notability of the subject of this article. Pavlor (talk) 10:22, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —UY Scuti ^Talk 14:10, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —UY Scuti ^Talk 14:10, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. —UY Scuti ^Talk 14:10, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 14:10, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

• Delete according to subject's request, although WP:Prof#C1 is passed. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:55, 30 November 2016 (UTC).
• Delete per WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE. I think he may also pass WP:PROF#C8, but the article is not so important that we need to keep it against the wishes of the subject. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:03, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.