Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noah Edward and the Time Traveling Adventure

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. (WP:SNOW close). North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:22, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Noah Edward and the Time Traveling Adventure

Noah Edward and the Time Traveling Adventure (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

DePRODed by anon without explanation. Concern was: Non notable self-published e-book from non notable author. Fails WP:NBOOK. Page is also clearly promotional. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:00, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 10:10, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:13, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

• Delete Fails WP:NBOOK. Entirely promotional. Lacks any useful references. Candidate for G11 speedy delete. Neiltonks (talk) 12:51, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
• Delete Per nom and per Neiltonks. Fails WP:NBOOK and written like an advertisement. Elliot321 (talk) 16:13, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
• Delete Fails WP:NBOOK. Ajf773 (talk) 17:50, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
• Keep, interesting looks like a good book — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.99.198.64 (talk) 06:21, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Well read it in your own time. Wikipedia is not a review site. Ajf773 (talk) 10:33, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

• Delete, does not meet WP:NBOOK or WP:GNG, absolutely zero useable reviews found, red flag raised when WorldCat shows zero library holdings, is this a candidate for WP:G11 - promotion/advertising? Coolabahapple (talk) 01:47, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
• Delete, as an example of why we need a WP:CSD for products. Toddst1 (talk) 01:50, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
• Delete as completely non-notable. Note that I have also started Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noah Edward and the Secret of VBS. --Finngall ^talk 20:32, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
• Delete Fails WP:NBOOK. NZ Footballs Conscience^(talk) 00:29, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.